PSA software (in French)
Kantata, Timetta, Certinia, Deltek Vantagepoint and pylotik: resources, time, finance, and what the client sees.
Choosing a steering tool starts with knowing which problem you want to solve. A PSA steers the profitability of services, a PPM an organization's portfolio, a work management tool a team's tasks. These comparisons say what each family covers, which need each tool answers, and where pylotik fits: when contracts, projects and maintenance are steered with the client and the teams, profitability included, from industry to the public sector.
No tool covers everything, and several families overlap. Starting from your priority avoids comparing software that does not answer the same question. To place all the families first, from ERP to MES, see the enterprise software landscape.
| Your priority | What fits | Examples compared |
|---|---|---|
| Steer the profitability of your projects and commitments: workload, time, contracts, margin | pylotik, from industry to the public sector: workload, time, fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts, ordered, invoiced, paid and margin at completion, with the client and the management of the teams. It does not issue invoices: it sends billing orders to the ERP, through a connector built to your needs. It was built during turnarounds and restructurings of service centers and projects. The PSAs compared are aimed at service companies | Kantata, Certinia, Timetta, Deltek Vantagepoint (in French) |
| Issue invoices and keep the books in the same tool, with no ERP alongside | A PSA | Kantata, Certinia, Timetta, Deltek Vantagepoint (in French) |
| Arbitrate a project portfolio | pylotik, which covers the steering and arbitration of the portfolio (portfolio view, workload, priorities, milestones, committees, decisions), with the client, the suppliers and the execution. A PPM remains preferable for an R&D pipeline run in Stage-Gate or a suite already deployed group-wide | Planisware, Planview, Sciforma, ServiceNow SPM (in French) |
| Steer teams, including internal ones | pylotik, which includes management (workload plan, time entry, weekly report, reviews) and connects to project ticketing tools such as Jira, through a connector built to your needs | Team steering (in French) |
| Organize tasks in flexible boards, with no commitment to keep | A work management tool, or project ticketing such as Jira | monday.com, Jira, ClickUp, Smartsheet, Wrike (in French) |
| Handle IT incidents under service levels | An ITSM, which includes IT ticketing | Project ticketing or ITSM (in French) |
| Follow manufacturing execution on the shop floor | An MES, with an APS or a production management system (GPAO) to plan | MES or ERP (in French) |
| Maintain an equipment fleet: preventive maintenance, breakdowns, parts | A CMMS | CMMS and the maintenance contract (in French) |
| Steer contracts, projects and maintenance with the client, on one shared set of data | Operational commitment management | pylotik |
Kantata, Timetta, Certinia, Deltek Vantagepoint and pylotik: resources, time, finance, and what the client sees.
Planisware, Planview, Sciforma, ServiceNow SPM: the portfolio, and what the client, the suppliers and the execution add to it.
Managing the work or steering the delivery of a commitment: Kantata, Timetta, Projektron BCS, monday.com.
What the client sees, what the client validates, and what their access costs: Teamwork.com, monday.com, Asana, Kantata.
Several suppliers, interdependent milestones, one shared trajectory: what each tool allows.
Project Monitor, SuitePro-G, z0 Gravity, Planisware and pylotik: steering a portfolio, or steering your projects with your clients.
Each direct comparison says why you would choose the other tool, where it remains preferable, and where pylotik is a relevant alternative.
The criteria that matter, the families of tools, and the profile each one suits.
What client-supplier project software must allow, and how to choose it.
Two families, two questions, and what pylotik adds: the client and the management of the teams.
What the ERP keeps, what the steering software holds, and how to keep your ERP while leaving spreadsheets behind.
ERP, CRM, PPM, PSA, ITSM, MES, APS, CMMS: the question each family answers, their overlaps, and who holds the reference for which data.
The ticket, the service and its levels, and what remains to be steered around a service contract.
The ISA-95 levels, and what a shop-floor delay becomes for the commitment made to the client.
Maintaining the equipment, or holding the contract with the client: two objects, two references.
To understand what pylotik does itself, see the product tour and operational commitment management.
A demonstration on a data set that is already filled in: contracts, projects, maintenance and committees, seen from the supplier's side and from the client's side.