Comparisonpylotik vs Projektron BCS: which software to steer your projects and your commitments?
pylotik vs Projektron BCS: two European software products that overlap widely, with two centers of gravity. Projektron BCS is a German project management and ERP software for service providers, highly integrated: projects, resources, contracts, invoicing, CRM, incident ticketing. pylotik steers the contracts, projects and maintenance of any organization, with its clients and suppliers, and holds their margin through the client and team management. To manage everything in a single system, BCS is a solid choice.
In 30 seconds
A serious competitor, a different angle.
Projektron BCS
Published by Projektron GmbH, in Berlin. A web software that covers planning, multi-project, portfolio, resources, time, CRM, quotes, invoicing, contracts and incident ticketing. On premises or in a cloud hosted in Germany, in the full BCS version or the lighter BCS.light.
pylotik
An operational commitment management software, designed and hosted in France, built during turnarounds and restructurings of service centers. Contracts, projects and maintenance, workload plan, time, margin, committees and decisions rest on a single data set, which the client consults and validates without paying for access.
The main difference
Projektron BCS runs the service company, from the quote to the electronic invoice. pylotik holds the profitability of each commitment through its two levers: the client, who validates the minutes and follows the indicators of its contract, and the team, whose workload and feedback are steered every week.
Each one's profile
Projektron BCS: a provider that wants a single system for its projects, its sales management, its invoicing and its support. pylotik: any organization that runs projects (industry, construction, engineering, digital services, public sector), keeps its ERP and wants to hold the margin of its commitments with its clients and its teams.
The audiences
Who each solution is for.
Projektron BCS
Providers and companies organized in projects IT, consulting, agencies, mechanical and electrical engineering, automotive, industry, healthcare, public sector.
Structured teams For small teams, the vendor points to BCS.light.
International organizations Ten interface languages, including French.
pylotik
Any organization that runs projects Industry, construction, engineering, digital services, administration: fixed-price or time-and-materials contracts, projects and maintenance, external or internal client.
Operations directors and managers Those who hold committees with the client and the workload plan with the team.
Their clients They access what concerns them for free, on every tier.
Its strengths
Why organizations choose Projektron BCS.
A deep project structure Subprojects, sub-subprojects, work packages, tasks, milestones, interactive Gantt and critical path, in a classic or agile method.
Complete invoicing Fixed price, time and materials and recurring services (maintenance, subscriptions), with electronic invoicing and DATEV export.
Contracts and support Contract generator, deadlines and reminders; incident ticketing with SLAs and an external support portal for clients.
Meetings, risks, mobile Meetings planned, recorded and followed up, risk and opportunity management, a mobile web app usable offline.
In all frankness
Where Projektron BCS remains the better choice.
Projektron BCS is the better fit when the organization wants a single system for its projects, its CRM, its quotes, the issuing of its invoices (electronic invoicing, DATEV export), its contracts and its support. pylotik does not issue invoices: it connects to the ERP, through a connector built to your needs, to send it the billing orders. It has no CRM, no quotes, no project ticketing, no SLA management and no offline mode; it connects to project ticketing tools such as Jira, through a connector. Its linked projects are limited to one level, where BCS nests subprojects and project groups. Deep project structure and client support with SLAs: BCS documents them, pylotik does not.
On hosting, both stay in Europe: BCS in Germany, with an on-premises installation possible, pylotik in France. The documentation consulted does not describe on-site intervention scheduling or a decision log.
Feature by feature
What each software covers.
Each cell cites the vendor's public documentation. "Not documented" means no source was found, not that the feature does not exist.
Functional comparison of pylotik and Projektron BCS, based on the vendors' public documentation (October 2026).
Via moduleLinked projects, one level (Extended Project)
YesSubprojects and sub-subprojects; nested project groups and programs.
Dependencies between projects
Via moduleMonitored, without recalculating dates
YesFinish-to-start and start-to-finish dependencies within the project; cross-project dependencies cited on the multi-project page (through a customer testimonial).
Resources and assignments
Yes
YesPeople, equipment and rooms.
Workload plan
Yes
YesCross-cutting utilization view to avoid overloads.
Time entry
YesWeekly, on web and mobile
Yes
Client contracts
YesA contract for each project
YesContract generator, life cycle, deadlines and reminders, contract control.
Maintenance contracts
YesVolume, catalogue, committee
YesBilling of recurring services (maintenance, subscriptions, flat rates) and a Services area for support and maintenance.
Intervention scheduling
Via moduleInterventions module
Not documented
Fixed-price projects
YesPayment schedule on milestones
YesFixed prices per project or subproject, including by milestone.
Time-and-materials projects
YesMonthly schedule, days × rate
Yes
Invoice issuing
Via integrationBilling orders sent to the ERP; the invoice is issued by the ERP
YesProject controlling; earned value analysis in the BCS edition.
Calendars
YesPersonal, project, client
YesProject calendar with milestones, meetings and appointments.
Meetings and minutes
YesAgenda, minutes
YesMeetings planned, organized, held, recorded and followed up in BCS.
Decision log
Yes
Not documented
Action tracking
Yes
PartialInternal tickets, reminders and progress log; no named RAID register.
Risk register
YesShared or internal
YesRisk and opportunity management in preparation, planning and execution.
Client access
Yes
YesExternal support portal for tickets; client access to projects cited in testimonials.
Client access without a license
YesExternal client organizations
Not documented
Client validation
YesMinutes, amendments, interventions
Not documented
Dashboards
Yes
YesProject reports, PDF export, multi-project evaluations.
Mobile app
YesInstallable web app
YesProgressive web app (PWA): time, expenses, contacts, offline.
Connectors and API
PartialProject ticketing (Jira) and ERP; optional connectors depending on needs; no public API
PartialOpen interfaces and standards, two-way synchronization with Jira; public API not detailed on the page.
French-language interface
YesAnd in English, chosen by each user
YesTen interface languages at no extra cost, including French.
Information checked in October 2026, against the vendors' public documentation. It changes: see the sources. The flag shows the vendor's country; the Cloud Act badge flags a vendor under US law, or owned by a US group, subject to the CLOUD Act; Non-EU, a vendor established outside the European Union.
Alternative to Projektron BCS
Where pylotik is a relevant alternative.
Projektron BCS targets the integrated management of a service provider. For the profitability of your projects and your commitments, whatever your sector, pylotik includes the client and team management; client validation and free client access are not documented at BCS. It was built during turnarounds and restructurings of service centers and projects, and covers workload plan, time, ordered, invoiced, paid, amount still due, cost and margin at completion.
Free client access BCS's pricing page counts each user logged in over a day, without mentioning free external users. In pylotik, the client portal is free for external client organizations, on every tier.
Validation by the client Minutes submitted to the client (validation, reasoned refusal, correction request, tacit validation at the deadline), decisions and actions: project governance binds both parties.
Team management Workload plan, weekly time entry, weekly report, reviews, feedback whose author chooses the recipient: team steering. Nobody is rated, nothing is scored.
Maintenance steered with the clientMaintenance contract management brings together period, volume in days, catalogue, committee and indicators shared with the client; in addition, intervention scheduling (Business tier) collects the client's signature.
Several suppliersMulti-project steering links a project to that of another supplier of which you are the client, with monitored milestones.
Even when well equipped, an organization often leaves the client dialogue in e-mails and the reporting in presentations. pylotik puts commitments, decisions, validations and reporting on a reference data set shared by supplier and client. See operational commitment management.
Frequently asked questions
What we are asked about Projektron BCS.
What is the difference between pylotik and Projektron BCS?
Projektron BCS is a highly integrated project management and ERP software: projects, resources, CRM, quotes, invoicing, contracts, incident ticketing. pylotik has a tighter scope, centered on profitability and on keeping commitments: contracts, projects and maintenance steered with the client, who accesses it for free, and with the teams. BCS runs the company, pylotik the margin of each commitment.
Do both handle maintenance contracts?
Yes. Projektron BCS bills recurring services (maintenance, subscriptions) and offers a Services area for support. pylotik tracks, in its core, the period, the volume in days, the catalogue, the committee and the indicators shared with the client, without issuing invoices.
Does the client have access to the project, and at what cost?
Projektron BCS offers an external support portal for tickets; its pricing page does not mention free external users. In pylotik, access for external client organizations is free on every tier; an internal client team takes up a seat according to its role.
Is pylotik a PSA software or an ERP like BCS?
It covers workload plan, time, ordered, invoiced, paid, cost and margin at completion, and adds the client and team management. It is not an ERP: no accounting, no CRM, no quotes, and it does not issue invoices; it connects to the ERP, through a connector built to your needs, to send it the billing orders. BCS, for its part, documents quotes, CRM and electronic invoicing.
Are both available in French and hosted in Europe?
Yes. Projektron BCS offers ten interface languages, including French, and a cloud hosted in Germany. pylotik is designed and hosted in France, with an interface available in French.