A workload no one sees in full
Each project manager sees what they ask for; no one sees what the same person accumulates. Overload is discovered when it has already produced a delay, or a departure.
Team steering starts on the side of those who produce. Each team member sees their workload for the coming weeks, enters their time weekly, and says every Friday what moved forward and what got stuck, to whom they choose. Their manager then steers on what comes up, not on a feeling, and the commitments made to clients rest on real capacity. This is the Management feature of the core: management and team steering.
Overload, fatigue and conflicting priorities show in those who produce long before they show in a schedule.
Each project manager sees what they ask for; no one sees what the same person accumulates. Overload is discovered when it has already produced a delay, or a departure.
What is stuck is said at the coffee machine, rarely where someone can act. The weekly check-in exists, but it leaves no trace, and it depends on the mood of the day.
Time is reconstructed at month end, from memory. What feeds margin and billing is then the least reliable data in the whole organization.
A team member's week, in one place, on the web as on the phone.
The workload plan tells everyone where they are expected, week by week. An intervention or a new project that would be added goes through their manager and the project managers concerned, instead of landing without warning.
Time is entered weekly, starting from what was planned: you correct the gap instead of re-entering everything. The finalized week goes to the manager for approval, who approves it or sends it back.
A few minutes: what moved forward, what got stuck, and alerts attached to a project if needed. The draft stays private until it is sent. The week's working conditions are optional, and if the team member chooses not to share them, their manager sees only a team aggregate.
An alert can concern the project, the organization, the hierarchy, or be sent to the next level up without going through the direct manager, or to the HR function only. The person who raises the alert chooses who reads it, and that protects them.
The manager collects nothing more: they read, they decide, they respond.
Operational commitment management says what was promised to the client. Team steering says whether it is tenable. The two live in the same tool because they talk about the same week: an alert attached to a project is read next to that project, and an overload is seen before it becomes a missed milestone.
No one is rated, nothing is scored. Each person's voice stays attached to its author, and it serves first of all to be heard.
No payroll, no annual reviews, no administrative staff management. Leave is kept there because it weighs on projects; the day an HRIS carries it, it is meant to come from there.
No rating, no ranking, no prediction. What comes up is a work fact, dated, attached to a project or a week, and read by those the author has chosen.
There is no questionnaire to fill in for management. There is a weekly report, written by the person who works, about their work.
They read their team's weekly reports. An alert goes where its author addresses it: to the project, to the hierarchy, to the next level up without going through them, or to the HR function only. And the detailed working conditions reach them only if the team member chooses to share them.
Yes. Time is entered weekly from the mobile app as from the web, starting from the workload plan. The weekly report and leave are there too.
A few minutes for the team member, on Friday, because the week starts from what was planned. For the manager, the review is done on what was written, with no extra meeting.
It is optional, aggregated for the manager if the team member does not wish to share it, and anonymized after twelve months.
The demo runs on a data set that is already filled in: a team member's week, then their manager's review.